

Take the Apple iPad Pro for example which a pixel count of 264, so outputting the image at 300 is enough to allow them to zoom into the image without it loosing quality. The reason why I suggest 300 is because we have to think about our target audience who may be using these high resolution displays and also people that like to view images on high resolution mobiles devices. Why 300 you may be asking, I thought monitors were 72ppi. If you are 100% sure that the final image will only ever be displayed on a screen, then you can quite easily scan at 300 pixels per inch (ppi). This all depends on your final output size, what will you be doing with the final edit ? Scanning Resolution Screen Based Output They talk about scanning resolution, and go into a great depth about overall performance, and in my opinion, its well worth bookmarking.Ĭoming back to the initial question of What resolution Should I scan My Negatives At.

The most comprehensive website I have found for testing a variety of scanners is In my experience, this is far from reality.Įach scanner regardless of what the marketing material tells you is going to have an optimal value. Their first reaction is to scan them at the highest values available in the scanning software thinking they are going to achieve the best scan. Scanning resolution is probably one of the first dilemmas people are faced with when they first start out scanning negatives. What Scan Resolution Should I Scan My Negatives At ?
